Ugandan music duo Kataleya and Kandle have finally opened up about their decision to part ways with their former management, Ray Pan, explaining that the separation was largely about growth and embracing a new chapter in their careers.
The talented duo officially confirmed earlier this year that their professional relationship with Ray Pan had come to an end, sparking curiosity among their fans about what could have led to the split. However, during a recent interview, the singers stopped short of revealing any specific disagreement or incident that caused the separation.
Instead, Kataleya and Kandle described the decision as a natural progression in their journey, saying they had reached a point where they wanted to challenge themselves differently and explore new opportunities in the music industry.
According to the duo, leaving their former management should not necessarily be interpreted as a fallout or conflict. They maintained that they have no personal issues with Ray Pan and that their decision was simply influenced by their desire to grow and take their careers in a different direction.
The singers noted that professional relationships can change as people develop, arguing that no one is permanently tied to one employer or business partner. They suggested that moving on can sometimes be necessary when individuals reach new stages in their careers and ambitions.
Kataleya and Kandle have also revealed that they have not yet entered into an agreement with a new management company. Instead, they are currently working with a wider team of professionals whom they believe can help them turn their musical plans and ambitions into reality.
Their comments come at a time when the duo appears determined to redefine its path in the entertainment industry after years of working under Ray Pan’s management. Fans are now waiting to see what the next chapter will bring for the singers as they continue to build their brand independently.
Ray Pan, meanwhile, had previously indicated that he was stepping away from artist management to concentrate on his restaurant business. He explained that managing musicians had consumed a significant amount of his personal resources, claiming that he had invested heavily in artists without seeing the financial returns he expected.
