Ugandan musician Eddy Kenzo has found himself at the center of controversy after posting a photo of himself performing in full military-style attire. The image quickly went viral on social media, triggering strong backlash from Ugandans who accused the artist of flaunting his privilege at a time when many political activists have faced imprisonment over similar attire.
The outrage stems from the stark contrast between the treatment of high-profile figures like Kenzo and the reality of ordinary Ugandans, particularly supporters of the National Unity Platform (NUP), who have been arrested or detained for wearing military-inspired clothing. This includes the iconic red beret, a symbol of the opposition party, which is often seen as a violation of the newly passed UPDF (Amendment) Act 2025.
Kenzo’s outfit, consisting of a camouflage jacket, cargo pants, a tactical vest, combat boots, a dark beanie, and sunglasses, closely resembled that of a soldier on duty. To add to the military theme, his outfit included patches, one of which resembled the U.S. flag, further emphasizing its combat nature. Under the UPDF (Amendment) Act, such clothing is prohibited for civilians.
The law, signed into effect by President Museveni in June 2025, prohibits civilians from wearing military-style clothing and accessories, which critics argue is a direct attempt to stifle political dissent and opposition. The law has been applied with notable consequences, particularly against members of the NUP, many of whom have been jailed for wearing the red beret—seen as a political statement of defiance.
Social media users wasted no time in voicing their displeasure over Kenzo’s attire, accusing the authorities of selectively enforcing the law. Many pointed out the disparity in how the law is applied to those associated with opposition groups compared to celebrities and government allies. One commenter, Rwakyarisi, questioned, “Will you be arrested for impersonating a soldier under the new UPDF Bill?” Another user, Matia, criticized the law’s inconsistent enforcement, stating, “And this is not from military stores… it’s a selective application of the law.”
Kyazze Fahad also weighed in, saying, “Meanwhile, someone has been in jail for two years for simply wearing an overall. Yet you are here walking free in military gear. Your children will be taught this history—you shouldn’t be proud of this.”
Kenzo’s military-style outfit is not an isolated incident. High-profile figures, including journalist Andrew Mwenda and Minister Lillian Aber, have faced similar criticism for donning military-related clothing in public. These repeated occurrences have intensified public suspicion, with many questioning whether the law is being used as a political tool to target opposition while allowing those in power to disregard it without consequence.
In defense, the Uganda People’s Defence Forces (UPDF) have consistently argued that individuals wearing military attire have obtained explicit permission from army leadership. However, this explanation has done little to quell the public’s frustration, with many seeing it as evidence of a two-tiered justice system where the law is applied selectively to suppress dissent while benefiting government allies and influential figures.
The controversy surrounding Kenzo’s outfit, alongside the broader debate over military clothing restrictions, highlights the deepening frustrations with Uganda’s legal system, particularly in the politically charged atmosphere of the country. While the UPDF maintains that its actions are legitimate, many Ugandans remain unconvinced, viewing the law as a tool for political control rather than a measure of national security.
